arrow_back Trending Legislation
Share share

Limiting US Entry Bans and Protecting Against Discrimination

New rules restrict the President's ability to impose entry bans to the US based on national origin, religion, or place of residence. They introduce greater transparency and Congressional oversight over such decisions, and make it easier to apply for waivers from bans. Citizens gain more protection against arbitrary decisions regarding entry and immigration benefits.
Key points
Non-discrimination: Visa, admission, or immigration benefits cannot be denied based on national origin, sex, religion, or place of residence.
Limited Presidential Authority: The President can only suspend entry in specific, justified cases that threaten security or public safety, and such suspensions must be narrowly tailored and time-limited.
Increased Congressional Oversight: The President must consult Congress before imposing a ban and regularly report on its effects; otherwise, the ban terminates.
Easier Waivers: The act presumes in favor of granting family-based and humanitarian waivers from restrictions.
Right to Judicial Review: Individuals harmed by unlawful actions under this subsection can file a lawsuit in court.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
51%
VOTING RESULTS
2021-04-21
For 218
Against 208
Abstain 0
Full voting results open_in_new
gavel
Status:
Expired
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
NO BAN Act
Print number: HR 1333
Sponsor: Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]
Process start date: 2021-02-25
Voting date: 2021-04-21
Meeting no: 1
Voting no: 127
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch
Summary & Status

Key Questions about Limiting US Entry Bans and Protecting Against Discrimination

A structured overview of the legislative process, official sources, status and civic context.

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is HR 1333.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2021-02-25.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Non-discrimination: Visa, admission, or immigration benefits cannot be denied based on national origin, sex, religion, or place of residence.
  • Limited Presidential Authority: The President can only suspend entry in specific, justified cases that threaten security or public safety, and such suspensions must be narrowly tailored and time-limited.
  • Increased Congressional Oversight: The President must consult Congress before imposing a ban and regularly report on its effects; otherwise, the ban terminates.
  • Easier Waivers: The act presumes in favor of granting family-based and humanitarian waivers from restrictions.
  • Right to Judicial Review: Individuals harmed by unlawful actions under this subsection can file a lawsuit in court.

What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Where is the official voting record?

The official roll call vote is recorded at: voting record

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 208 (Roll no. 127). (text: CR H2005-2006)

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-27.

Analysis and Potential Impact of HR 1333

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge. Review our public AI processing logs for full transparency, and use Lustra to track active legislation for instant status push notifications.

CATEGORIES

Migration Courts and Law Security