arrow_back Back to App

Protecting Servicemembers' Employment Rights: New Arbitration Rules

This act strengthens the employment and reemployment rights of servicemembers after their service. A key change is that employers can no longer require servicemembers to agree to arbitration as a condition of employment, giving them more freedom to pursue their rights in court.
Key points
All procedural protections and provisions related to servicemembers' employment are now explicitly covered.
Arbitration agreements for employment claims by servicemembers are unenforceable unless both parties voluntarily agree to arbitration after a complaint has been filed in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board.
Consent to arbitration is not considered voluntary if it's a condition of employment, advancement, or receiving benefits.
article Official text account_balance Process page
Expired
Citizen Poll
No votes cast
Additional Information
Print number: 117_HR_2195
Sponsor: Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1]
Process start date: 2021-03-26
Lustra uses Artificial Intelligence. Verify details in source documents.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

Protecting the Employment Rights of Servicemembers Act

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 117_HR_2195.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2021-03-26.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • All procedural protections and provisions related to servicemembers' employment are now explicitly covered.
  • Arbitration agreements for employment claims by servicemembers are unenforceable unless both parties voluntarily agree to arbitration after a complaint has been filed in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board.
  • Consent to arbitration is not considered voluntary if it's a condition of employment, advancement, or receiving benefits.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-27.

CATEGORIES

Labor Courts and Law