What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is HR 2195.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2021-03-26.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr2195/BILLS-117hr2195ih.htm

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-27.

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1].

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Analysis and Potential Impact of HR 2195

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge. Review our public AI processing logs for full transparency, and use Lustra to track active legislation for instant status push notifications.

Protecting Servicemembers' Employment Rights: New Arbitration Rules

Q: What are the main provisions?

Key points include: All procedural protections and provisions related to servicemembers' employment are now explicitly covered. Arbitration agreements for employment claims by servicemembers are unenforceable unless both parties voluntarily agree to arbitration after a complaint has been filed in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board. Consent to arbitration is not considered voluntary if it's a condition of employment, advancement, or receiving benefits.

This act strengthens the employment and reemployment rights of servicemembers after their service. A key change is that employers can no longer require servicemembers to agree to arbitration as a condition of employment, giving them more freedom to pursue their rights in court.

Key points

All procedural protections and provisions related to servicemembers' employment are now explicitly covered.

Arbitration agreements for employment claims by servicemembers are unenforceable unless both parties voluntarily agree to arbitration after a complaint has been filed in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Consent to arbitration is not considered voluntary if it's a condition of employment, advancement, or receiving benefits.

article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill

gavel

Status:

Expired

Record your position for audit.

Why does your vote on bills matter?

It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.

Additional Information

Protecting the Employment Rights of Servicemembers Act

Print number: HR 2195

Sponsor: Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1]

Process start date: 2021-03-26

System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.

Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20

Source data: api.congress.gov

AI work logs for this document launch

Protecting Servicemembers' Employment Rights: New Arbitration Rules

Key Questions about Protecting Servicemembers' Employment Rights: New Arbitration Rules