arrow_back Civic Audit
Share share

Protecting doctors from unfair professional reviews

This act aims to protect doctors from unfair evaluations of their work that may not be based on actual competence or conduct. The changes are intended to ensure that professional reviews are fair, which could impact the stability of medical staff and the quality of healthcare. Citizens may feel an indirect impact through potentially greater trust in the physician evaluation system.
Key points
Introduces a provision that some physician peer review decisions may be based on factors other than competence.
Emphasizes the need to protect competent physicians from unfair peer review decisions.
The changes are effective as if included in the original 1986 Act.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
gavel
Status:
Expired
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Print number: 117_HR_5386
Sponsor: Rep. Scott, David [D-GA-13]
Process start date: 2021-09-27
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

Shield and Protect Physician Peer-Reviews Act of 2021

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 117_HR_5386.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2021-09-27.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Introduces a provision that some physician peer review decisions may be based on factors other than competence.
  • Emphasizes the need to protect competent physicians from unfair peer review decisions.
  • The changes are effective as if included in the original 1986 Act.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Scott, David [D-GA-13].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-28.

What is the impact of this bill?

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge.

CATEGORIES

Health Courts and Law