arrow_back Civic Audit
Share share

Protecting veterans and Camp Lejeune victims from excessive legal fees

This act reinstates penalties for unauthorized fees charged to veterans for benefit claims assistance. It also sets limits on attorney fees for individuals affected by Camp Lejeune water contamination, ensuring that most of the compensation goes to the victims, not their lawyers.
Key points
Veterans: Criminal penalties are reinstated for individuals charging unauthorized fees to veterans for assistance with benefit claims, aiming to protect veterans from exploitation.
Camp Lejeune: Limits are imposed on attorney fees for individuals affected by water contamination at Camp Lejeune. Lawyers can charge a maximum of 20% if the claim is resolved within 180 days, or 33.3% after litigation begins.
Camp Lejeune: Compensation for Camp Lejeune victims must be deposited into trust accounts, and attorneys can only receive their fees after the funds have been disbursed to the client, preventing unfair practices.
Camp Lejeune: Attorneys exceeding fee limits may face fines up to $5,000. Non-compliance with payment terms is also subject to penalties.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
Status: Expired
Civic Will
Checking votes...
I support
I oppose
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Print number: 117_S_5274
Sponsor: Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
Process start date: 2022-12-15
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure — full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source—always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate criminal penalties for persons charging veterans unauthorized fees relating to claims for benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 117_S_5274.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the Senate.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2022-12-15.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Veterans: Criminal penalties are reinstated for individuals charging unauthorized fees to veterans for assistance with benefit claims, aiming to protect veterans from exploitation.
  • Camp Lejeune: Limits are imposed on attorney fees for individuals affected by water contamination at Camp Lejeune. Lawyers can charge a maximum of 20% if the claim is resolved within 180 days, or 33.3% after litigation begins.
  • Camp Lejeune: Compensation for Camp Lejeune victims must be deposited into trust accounts, and attorneys can only receive their fees after the funds have been disbursed to the client, preventing unfair practices.
  • Camp Lejeune: Attorneys exceeding fee limits may face fines up to $5,000. Non-compliance with payment terms is also subject to penalties.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Introduced in Senate

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-29.

What is the impact of this bill?

We don't know—that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge.

CATEGORIES

Benefits Courts and Law