arrow_back Civic Audit
Share share

House Resolution: Condemning Actions Against Donald Trump

This House Resolution expresses the view that actions against Donald Trump are unjust and damage public trust. It calls for an end to the weaponization of the federal government for political purposes and for accountability for those responsible. The document also highlights the belief that Donald Trump's return to the presidency would greatly benefit the United States.
Key points
The resolution condemns what it calls the political persecution of Donald Trump, deeming it morally unjustifiable and damaging to institutional trust.
It calls for an end to the weaponization of the Federal Government against Donald Trump and the Republican Party.
It demands accountability from those within the Biden administration responsible for these actions.
It expresses the belief that Donald Trump's re-inauguration as President would enormously benefit the United States.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
gavel
Status:
Expired
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Print number: 118_HRES_1021
Sponsor: Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]
Process start date: 2024-02-16
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the political persecution of President Donald J. Trump is morally unjustifiable and has damaged institutional trust to an extraordinary degree; that the Biden administration's weaponization of the Federal Government against Donald Trump, the Republican Party's nominee for President in 2024, must end; that those responsible for the persecution of Donald Trump within the Biden administration must be held accountable by Congress; and that the United States would benefit enormously from having Donald J. Trump inaugurated once again as the President of the United States on January 20, 2025.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 118_HRES_1021.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2024-02-16.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • The resolution condemns what it calls the political persecution of Donald Trump, deeming it morally unjustifiable and damaging to institutional trust.
  • It calls for an end to the weaponization of the Federal Government against Donald Trump and the Republican Party.
  • It demands accountability from those within the Biden administration responsible for these actions.
  • It expresses the belief that Donald Trump's re-inauguration as President would enormously benefit the United States.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-24.

What is the impact of this bill?

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge.

CATEGORIES

Courts and Law Economy Security