arrow_back Civic Audit
Share share

Military, Veterans Affairs Funding, and Sanctions on International Criminal Court

This House Resolution sets the rules for considering two key bills. The first allocates funds for military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs, potentially impacting services and benefits for veterans. The second bill imposes sanctions on the International Criminal Court if it attempts to investigate or prosecute protected persons of the U.S. or its allies, which could affect the U.S.'s international standing.
Key points
Setting the budget for military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2025, impacting military infrastructure and veteran care.
Imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court for actions against U.S. or allied protected persons, potentially altering international relations.
Establishing debate and amendment procedures for both bills in the House of Representatives.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
52%
VOTING RESULTS
2024-06-04
For 208
Against 195
Abstain 0
Full voting results open_in_new
gavel
Status:
Adopted
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Print number: 118_HRES_1269
Sponsor: Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14]
Process start date: 2024-06-03
Voting date: 2024-06-04
Meeting no: 2
Voting no: 236
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8580) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8282) to impose sanctions with respect to the International Criminal Court engaged in any effort to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute any protected person of the United States and its allies.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 118_HRES_1269.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2024-06-03.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Setting the budget for military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2025, impacting military infrastructure and veteran care.
  • Imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court for actions against U.S. or allied protected persons, potentially altering international relations.
  • Establishing debate and amendment procedures for both bills in the House of Representatives.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Adopted.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Where is the official voting record?

The official roll call vote is recorded at: voting record

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 195 (Roll no. 236). (text: CR H3587-3588)

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-24.

What is the impact of this bill?

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge.

CATEGORIES

Public Investments Security Courts and Law