arrow_back Civic Audit
Share share

Congressional Debate: Censorship, US Waters, COVID-19 Origin

This document sets the rules for House of Representatives debate on three key issues. These include prohibiting federal employees from censoring viewpoints, revising the definition of "Waters of the United States," and declassifying information on COVID-19's origin. Citizens should follow these debates as they may impact free speech, environmental protection, and access to public information.
Key points
Restricting federal employees from censoring viewpoints, potentially strengthening free speech.
Revising the definition of "Waters of the United States," which could affect environmental protection and land use regulations.
Requiring declassification of COVID-19 origin information, potentially increasing transparency and public data access.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
51%
VOTING RESULTS
2023-03-08
For 216
Against 206
Abstain 0
Full voting results open_in_new
gavel
Status:
Adopted
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Print number: 118_HRES_199
Sponsor: Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4]
Process start date: 2023-03-07
Voting date: 2023-03-08
Meeting no: 1
Voting no: 135
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 140) to amend title 5, United States Code, to prohibit Federal employees from advocating for censorship of viewpoints in their official capacity, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 27) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States'"; and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 619) to require the Director of National Intelligence to declassify information relating to the origin of COVID-19, and for other purposes.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 118_HRES_199.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2023-03-07.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Restricting federal employees from censoring viewpoints, potentially strengthening free speech.
  • Revising the definition of "Waters of the United States," which could affect environmental protection and land use regulations.
  • Requiring declassification of COVID-19 origin information, potentially increasing transparency and public data access.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Adopted.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Where is the official voting record?

The official roll call vote is recorded at: voting record

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 206 (Roll No. 135).

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-24.

What is the impact of this bill?

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge.

CATEGORIES

Courts and Law Environment Health