arrow_back Back to App

Recognizing States' Right to Defend Against Border Invasion

This resolution emphasizes that border states have the right to defend themselves against threats like cartels and criminals due to the federal government's inaction. This could mean these states will take their own measures to protect residents and borders, potentially impacting local safety and resources.
Key points
Border states like Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California may act independently to defend against border threats.
The resolution states the federal government has failed to provide adequate protection, forcing states to spend billions on border issues.
Increased crime, drug smuggling (including fentanyl), and terrorist threats are cited as reasons for concern for citizen safety.
article Official text account_balance Process page
Expired
Citizen Poll
No votes cast
Additional Information
Print number: 118_HRES_50
Sponsor: Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]
Process start date: 2023-01-20
Lustra uses Artificial Intelligence. Verify details in source documents.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch

OFFICIAL LEGAL TITLE

Recognizing that article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution explicitly reserves to the States the sovereign power to repel an invasion and defend their citizenry from the overwhelming and "imminent danger" posed by paramilitary, narco-terrorist cartels, terrorists and criminal actors who have seized control of our southern border.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is 118_HRES_50.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2023-01-20.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Border states like Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California may act independently to defend against border threats.
  • The resolution states the federal government has failed to provide adequate protection, forcing states to spend billions on border issues.
  • Increased crime, drug smuggling (including fentanyl), and terrorist threats are cited as reasons for concern for citizen safety.
What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-24.

CATEGORIES

Security Migration Courts and Law