arrow_back Trending Legislation
Share share

Simplified Forest Management: Two Alternatives Only

This new bill changes how forest management projects are evaluated, limiting the analysis to two options: taking action or doing nothing. This aims to speed up decisions for timber production areas, impacting wildfire safety and forest health in your community.
Key points
Environmental impact assessments for forest projects will now only consider two alternatives: the proposed activity or no action.
This applies to forests designated for timber production, especially those with community wildfire protection plans or developed collaboratively.
The 'no action' alternative must evaluate effects on forest health, wildfire potential, property loss, and water supply.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
gavel
Status:
Expired
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Action Versus No Action Act
Print number: HR 189
Sponsor: Rep. McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5]
Process start date: 2023-01-09
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch
Summary & Status

Key Questions about Simplified Forest Management: Two Alternatives Only

A structured overview of the legislative process, official sources, status and civic context.

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is HR 189.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2023-01-09.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • Environmental impact assessments for forest projects will now only consider two alternatives: the proposed activity or no action.
  • This applies to forests designated for timber production, especially those with community wildfire protection plans or developed collaboratively.
  • The 'no action' alternative must evaluate effects on forest health, wildfire potential, property loss, and water supply.

What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Expired.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-24.

Analysis and Potential Impact of HR 189

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge. Review our public AI processing logs for full transparency, and use Lustra to track active legislation for instant status push notifications.

CATEGORIES

Environment Agriculture