arrow_back Trending Legislation
Share share

House Condemns Members of Congress for Allegedly Inciting Military Disloyalty.

This House Resolution condemns six Members of Congress for publicly urging military and intelligence personnel to defy orders from the Commander in Chief (the President) if they deem them unlawful. While this resolution does not create new law, it highlights a severe political conflict regarding the integrity of the military chain of command and national security. Citizens should note this debate concerns the stability and trust placed in military institutions.
Key points
The House denounces specific Members of Congress for their public statements directed at the military and intelligence communities.
The accusation centers on attempting to sow disloyalty among service members toward the President and encouraging violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
The resolution asserts that such rhetoric compromises national security and undermines confidence in military institutions.
article Official text account_balance Process page notifications_active Track this Bill
gavel
Status:
Introduced
Record your position for audit.
Why does your vote on bills matter?
It creates raw, undeniable proof. Civic Will provides the permanent data to verify the Government's loyalty towards its citizens (explained here). Start recording it now.
Additional Information
Denouncing dangerous and seditious rhetoric by Members of Congress and expressing condemnation of Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Elissa Slotkin, Representative Jason Crow, Representative Christopher Deluzio, Representative Maggie Goodlander, and Representative Chrissy Houlahan for attempting to sow disallegiance amongst members of the United States military and intelligence community and encouraging them to act against the Commander in Chief and President of the United States and violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Print number: HRES 932
Sponsor: Rep. Zinke, Ryan K. [R-MT-1]
Process start date: 2025-12-04
System Note: Lustra is free, publicly auditable civic infrastructure, with full source code available on GitHub. You are reading sterilized legislative data, processed by our radical neutrality engine to strip political spin and retain factual mechanics. We process only official government data. Original documents remain the authoritative source, always verify them if you can.
Summarized by: gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025
Source data: api.congress.gov
AI work logs for this document launch
Summary & Status

Key Questions about House Condemns Members of Congress for Allegedly Inciting Military Disloyalty.

A structured overview of the legislative process, official sources, status and civic context.

What is the official ID of this bill?

The official print number for this legislation is HRES 932.

Which chamber initiated this legislation?

This legislation was initiated in the House of Representatives.

When did the legislative process begin?

The process officially started on 2025-12-04.

What are the main provisions?

Key points include:

  • The House denounces specific Members of Congress for their public statements directed at the military and intelligence communities.
  • The accusation centers on attempting to sow disloyalty among service members toward the President and encouraging violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
  • The resolution asserts that such rhetoric compromises national security and undermines confidence in military institutions.

What is the specific legal status?

The current status is Introduced.

Where can I read the full text of this legislation?

The full official text is available at: View full text

Who is the primary sponsor?

The primary sponsor is Rep. Zinke, Ryan K. [R-MT-1].

What is the latest detailed status?

The latest detailed status is: Submitted in House

Is this summary verified?

Yes. This content was analyzed by AI and verified by the Lustra Judge System on 2025-12-22.

Analysis and Potential Impact of HRES 932

We don't know, that is up to you to decide. Summarizing raw data with AI is fundamentally different from predicting socio-economic outcomes. As of 2026, we believe impact assessment strictly requires a human in the loop to verify and judge. Review our public AI processing logs for full transparency, and use Lustra to track active legislation for instant status push notifications.

CATEGORIES

Security Courts and Law