Civic Legislative Initiative | Draft No. 013
THE NATIONAL SECURITY INTEGRITY AND ANTI-KOMPROMAT ACT
Model Law on Counter-Intelligence Risks and Removal of Compromised Officials and Contractors
Version 1.0
Determining that susceptibility to blackmail constitutes an immediate threat to national sovereignty; Establishing that participation in human trafficking creates coercive liabilities incompatible with public trust; Hereby mandates the revocation of funds, clearances, and authority from compromised persons.
CHAPTER I: DEFINITIONS & SCOPE
Art. 1.
1. Coercive Influence Risk: Any individual confirmed to have participated in, facilitated, or knowingly concealed a commercial sex trafficking operation or felony crimes against minors under applicable federal or state law.
2. Covered Persons: This Act applies to:
a) All elected and appointed public officials, judges, and military officers;
b) Any individual or entity receiving federal grants, contracts, or subsidies exceeding $500,000 annually ("Major Government Contractors");
c) Executives of corporations holding federal security clearances.
3. Presumption of Vulnerability: It is legally presumed that a Covered Person subject to such blackmail material is vulnerable to undue influence by foreign intelligence services. This presumption renders them unfit to hold public office or receive taxpayer funds.
CHAPTER II: DETECTION & SUSPENSION
Art. 2.
1. Investigation Trigger: The Inspector General (IG) of the relevant agency shall initiate an investigation upon receiving a credible whistleblower complaint, intelligence referral, or findings from a routine audit indicating potential Coercive Influence Risk.
2. Immediate Suspension (Probable Cause): Upon a preliminary finding supported by probable cause that a Covered Person constitutes a Coercive Influence Risk, the IG must immediately suspend their security clearances and freeze all pending federal grant/contract disbursements. This is a temporary administrative measure to protect the Treasury and National Security.
3. Final Adjudication (Clear and Convincing): The case is then referred to the Special Division of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit designated to hear cases of Public Trust. Permanent removal and forfeiture require proof by clear and convincing evidence.
CHAPTER III: CONSEQUENCES & JUDICIAL INTEGRITY
Art. 3.
1. Public Officials: Upon final adjudication, officials are permanently removed from office (subject to constitutional procedures for elected officials) and forfeit all pensions.
2. Contractors & Grantees: Upon final adjudication, any government contract or grant held by a compromised individual (or an entity they control) is immediately rescinded for default ("Breach of Ethics"). The individual is permanently debarred from receiving future federal funds.
3. Judicial Complicity: A Judge who knowingly issues a sealing order for the primary purpose of concealing a Coercive Influence Risk acts ultra vires. The Attorney General is mandated to transmit such findings to the House Judiciary Committee for impeachment consideration.
CHAPTER IV: MANDATORY DISCLOSURE & FUNDING
Art. 4.
1. Independent Review Board: An independent, citizen-led Review Board is established to oversee the declassification of files related to trafficking networks. Members shall be appointed by the Comptroller General of the United States from a pool of retired federal judges and intelligence officers with no history of political appointment.
2. Disclosure Mandate: The Board shall release all unredacted documents within 120 days. This period may be extended once by an additional 60 days upon a showing of logistical necessity. Redactions are permitted ONLY to protect the identity of minor victims or innocent bystanders. No redaction shall be permitted to protect the reputation of a Covered Person.
3. Funding & Guarantee: Operations are funded via a Treasury Bridge Loan, reimbursed fully by assets seized from compromised individuals. In the event seized assets are insufficient, the operation of the Board is guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury.
CHAPTER V: GENERAL PROVISIONS
Art. 5.
1. Severability: If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid (e.g., regarding the removal of constitutionally elected officials), the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the Act which can be given effect without the invalid provision.
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (EXPOSÉ)
1. THE THREAT ASSESSMENT
We are facing a Counter-Intelligence crisis. "Honey Traps" (sexual blackmail) are used to control policymakers and business leaders. When a public official or a defense contractor is secretly involved in heinous crimes, they are serving their blackmailers, not the public. This vulnerability extends beyond government offices to the billionaires and institutions funded by taxpayer money.
2. THE OBJECTIVE
This Act enforces the "Clean Hands" doctrine. It asserts that access to public money—whether as a salary, a pension, or a multi-million dollar grant—is a privilege, not a right. That privilege is forfeited when an individual engages in conduct that subjects them to catastrophic blackmail. The Act creates a mechanism to surgically remove these risks from the federal ecosystem.
3. EXPECTED IMPACT
Adoption of this Act will harden the nation against foreign influence. By extending penalties to government contractors and grantees, it strikes at the financial heart of the networks that protect predators. It ensures that taxpayers are never again forced to subsidize the lifestyles of those who prey on the vulnerable.